This is my fourth Trollope, and while not the best I've read (that distinction goes to The Way We Live Now, so far), it was a good story. I have found that Trollope is a story-teller, and a very good one at that. An Eye for an Eye, written in 1879, is actually a tale that is much more characteristic of those written by Elizabeth Gaskell, Thomas Hardy or even George Eliot. An Eye for an Eye is a tragedy in every sense of the word, and you can see the tragic ending coming like an on-rushing freight train.
Without giving away too much of the plot of this slim little novel (just 201 pages), the gist of the tale revolves around a handsome young Army officer, Fred Neville, whose regiment has been recently billeted in a remote station along the Irish coast. During the course of his jaunts about the wild Irish countryside, Fred meets a beautiful young Irish Catholic woman, Kate O'Hara. Concurrent with his Army duties in Ireland, Fred is selected by his elderly uncle, Lord Scroope, to become the heir apparent and inherent the Scroope wealth, lands, and title. Suffice it to say that his uncle is not particularly interested in Fred bringing a young Irish Catholic woman back to England as the future Lady Scroope. With the dilemma of both loving the young woman and recognizing the responsibility to his family, Fred takes actions and makes promises to Kate and his uncle that creates an impossible situation that can only end badly for everyone.
In An Eye for an Eye, Trollope definitely puts his reader 'front-and-center' with many of the social issues of the day, including (1) Catholic vs Protestant, (2) Anglo vs Irish, (3) class differences, and, of course, the (4) gender and sexuality issues that dominate the relationship between Fred and Kate.
Like each of the Trollope novels I've read to date, this was an engaging and well-written story that I quite enjoyed. I guess I really don't know why I don't read Trollope more often.
***
An Eye for an Eye
By Anthony Trollope
Oxford University Press
Softcover, 256 pp.
pro se = L. "for oneself."
prose = L. 'prosa.' the ordinary language people use is speaking or writing: a prosaic style, quality, or condition.
The Journal of My Travels through the World's Great Literature
Showing posts with label historical fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label historical fiction. Show all posts
July 15, 2013
January 5, 2013
Review: "Something Red" By Douglas Nicholas
Every once in a great while you just happen upon a book and author that you absolutely know nothing about, but you take a chance and take it home with you and you are simply blown away at what you've discovered. Something Red, by Douglas Nicholas, is just such a book and is really a stunning little novel. This dark and grim story revolves around a small troupe of travelers on a journey through a rugged wild portion of northern England during a bleak and cold winter in the 13th Century. During the course of their trip the horror and terror mounts until the explosive climax near the end of the book.
The author of Something Red, Douglas Nicholas, in my opinion, is a writer of great promise. Not only can he spin a great yarn, but his prose is gorgeous and verges on the poetic at times; which actually makes sense as Nicholas is apparently a well known published poet from the Hudson Valley of New York state. The characters in Something Red are interesting and well wrought, and his use of magic and mythology is deft and sure-footed and works well in the plot. I have to say that more times than not this dark tale reminded me of the early Anglo-Saxon alliterative epic poem, Beowulf (especially Seamus Heaney's brilliant translation). Also, it is actually quite hard to pigeon-hole this book as horror, fantasy, mystery, or medieval historical fiction--as it really is all of the above. Mostly though, this is just one damn good book that I had a hard time putting down until I'd read the last page. I ain't gonna say anymore, other than to urge you to read this superb and riveting debut novel from Douglas Nicholas. This received five out of five stars from me, as it really was a most excellent novel, and one that I will surely read again sometime soon.
Something Red
By Douglas Nicholas
Emily Bestler Books/ATRIA Books, 2012
315 pp.
ISBN 978-1-4516-6007-4
***
The author of Something Red, Douglas Nicholas, in my opinion, is a writer of great promise. Not only can he spin a great yarn, but his prose is gorgeous and verges on the poetic at times; which actually makes sense as Nicholas is apparently a well known published poet from the Hudson Valley of New York state. The characters in Something Red are interesting and well wrought, and his use of magic and mythology is deft and sure-footed and works well in the plot. I have to say that more times than not this dark tale reminded me of the early Anglo-Saxon alliterative epic poem, Beowulf (especially Seamus Heaney's brilliant translation). Also, it is actually quite hard to pigeon-hole this book as horror, fantasy, mystery, or medieval historical fiction--as it really is all of the above. Mostly though, this is just one damn good book that I had a hard time putting down until I'd read the last page. I ain't gonna say anymore, other than to urge you to read this superb and riveting debut novel from Douglas Nicholas. This received five out of five stars from me, as it really was a most excellent novel, and one that I will surely read again sometime soon.
Something Red
By Douglas Nicholas
Emily Bestler Books/ATRIA Books, 2012
315 pp.
ISBN 978-1-4516-6007-4
***
August 7, 2012
Review: "Cain at Gettysburg" By Ralph Peters
Cain at Gettysburg, by Ralph Peters, is a new historical novel describing the bloody three-day battle at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on July1-3, 1863. Gettysburg is still the largest land battle ever fought on the North American continent, and was the bloodiest of the American Civil War.
While superficially similar in scope to Michael Shaara's epic novel The Killer Angels, Peters' book also focuses on the battle leaders on both sides, as well as several of the enlisted men from a Confederate regiment (the 26th North Carolina) and some of the Union's German-Americans (of the 26th Wisconsin) and Irish-Americans (of the 69th Pennsylvania). Shaara spent much of his novel telling of the brilliant and dogged defense of the extreme left of the Union line at Little Round Top by the 20th Maine, commanded by Colonel Joshua Chamberlain; and Peters, in Cain at Gettysburg, tells the story of the fierce combat associated with the first day of fighting near Seminary Ridge and the area just north of the town of Gettysburg. This part of the battlefield was ably contested by elements of the First and Eleventh Corps of the Union Army. The time bought by the courageous actions of these two army corps allowed the Union Army to slowly fall back and dig in on some very good ground (i.e., up on Cemetery Ridge) that ultimately led to the defeat of the Confederate forces after three days of ferocious combat.
Peters' military background, and that he has been a serious student of the Civil War for 50+ years, has resulted in a historical novel that pays close attention to detail and the facts, and focuses on accurately describing the tactics and consequences of the bloody business that was combat between the regiments and brigades during the Civil War. Peters is a very good writer and in telling this very compelling tale about one of the seminal moments in American history he really gives it his all. This is grim, gritty stuff and it is not for the faint of heart, but then war never is, is it?
P.S. If you like historical detective fiction set during the American Civil War, I understand that Ralph Peters, under the pen-name of Owen Parry, has written a series of five or six historical novels featuring his character, Union Major Abel Jones. I've not yet read any of these, but based upon my enjoyment of Cain at Gettysburg I expect I will try one or two of them.
***
Cain at Gettysburg
By Ralph Peters
Forge Books, 2012
Hardcover, 432 pages
While superficially similar in scope to Michael Shaara's epic novel The Killer Angels, Peters' book also focuses on the battle leaders on both sides, as well as several of the enlisted men from a Confederate regiment (the 26th North Carolina) and some of the Union's German-Americans (of the 26th Wisconsin) and Irish-Americans (of the 69th Pennsylvania). Shaara spent much of his novel telling of the brilliant and dogged defense of the extreme left of the Union line at Little Round Top by the 20th Maine, commanded by Colonel Joshua Chamberlain; and Peters, in Cain at Gettysburg, tells the story of the fierce combat associated with the first day of fighting near Seminary Ridge and the area just north of the town of Gettysburg. This part of the battlefield was ably contested by elements of the First and Eleventh Corps of the Union Army. The time bought by the courageous actions of these two army corps allowed the Union Army to slowly fall back and dig in on some very good ground (i.e., up on Cemetery Ridge) that ultimately led to the defeat of the Confederate forces after three days of ferocious combat.
Peters' military background, and that he has been a serious student of the Civil War for 50+ years, has resulted in a historical novel that pays close attention to detail and the facts, and focuses on accurately describing the tactics and consequences of the bloody business that was combat between the regiments and brigades during the Civil War. Peters is a very good writer and in telling this very compelling tale about one of the seminal moments in American history he really gives it his all. This is grim, gritty stuff and it is not for the faint of heart, but then war never is, is it?
P.S. If you like historical detective fiction set during the American Civil War, I understand that Ralph Peters, under the pen-name of Owen Parry, has written a series of five or six historical novels featuring his character, Union Major Abel Jones. I've not yet read any of these, but based upon my enjoyment of Cain at Gettysburg I expect I will try one or two of them.
***
Cain at Gettysburg
By Ralph Peters
Forge Books, 2012
Hardcover, 432 pages
November 8, 2010
Review: "Ransom" By David Malouf
This is without a doubt one of the best books I've read in a while. It was so damned good that I turned around and read it again as soon as I had finished reading it the first time. It doesn't take long to read, at just over 200 pages, but it packs a big wallop. Ransom, published in 2009, is Australian poet and author David Malouf's most recent offering after nearly ten years; and I have to say that it was well worth the wait.
Malouf's novel takes as its inspiration a series of events that occur near the end of Homer's The Iliad (my review of the Fagles translation of The Iliad can be found here), including the following: the death of Achilles' friend Patroclus (Book 16), Achilles' killing of Hector (Book 22), the funeral of Patroclus (Book 23), and Priam's late-night visit to Achilles to beg for the return of his son's body (Book 24). With little more than passing references in his novel, Malouf wisely leaves it to Homer to tell the story of the first three events, and instead focuses most of his book on the last--that of the Trojan King, Priam, and his efforts to claim his son's body from Achilles. Homer's description of Priam's meeting with Achilles is, in my opinion, the most emotionally charged and powerful scene in the whole poem. In his novel, Malouf, the poet/author, lyrically and tenderly delves into the psychology of the grieving warrior over the loss of his friend, and the grieving father and his efforts to retrieve the body of his slain son. While this is surely one of the saddest stories I have read of late, at the same time the reader cannot help but be buoyed up by Malouf's beautiful portrayal of the innate sense of decency, goodness, and the inherent need for redemption that resides in each of us--even in the face of great adversity and tragedy.
My impression of the Trojan War comes from reading The Iliad, and largely seems to be nothing more than a game board set up on a table and surrounded by the pantheon of gods and goddesses who reached down and pushed playing pieces about; with one side gaining a brief advantage, and then the other. The upshot was that for ten long years the war between the Achaeans and Trojans reeled back and forth across the Scamander Plain outside of the walls of Troy, and resulted in the bloody slaughter of hundreds, if not thousands, of Greeks and Trojans alike. Reading The Iliad left me with the overwhelming feeling that it all seemed preordained, and that the story just had to play out as foretold. What Malouf does so brilliantly in Ransom is to 'liberate' a portion of this epic tragic tale from the control of the gods and Fate, and gives the power of 'free choice' and decision-making to two of the primary protagonists--Priam and Achilles.
For ten days in a row, following the death of Hector in single-combat with Achilles, Priam and the Trojans have watched Achilles drag Hector's body behind his chariot around the funeral mound of his slain friend, Patroclus. Finally, Priam can take it no longer, he must do something. Late one night he has a vision of something "new" occurring. He sees that he must go to Achilles, not as King of Troy, but as the father of a dead son, and appeal to him man-to-man for the body of his son. He will ride to the Achaean camp without all of the trappings of his authority on an old and unadorned cart pulled by two mules with an old grey-haired Trojan country rustic as the cart-driver.
A goodly portion of this little novel is the story of the carter, Somax, and Priam and their journey out of the city and through the countryside to the Achaean camp. The two old men begin to get to know one another, and slowly but surely develop a tremendous amount of empathy for one another. After a few hours of slow plodding in the wagon, Somax stops at the bank of the river they have to ford and has the King wade out into the river just to feel the coolness of the water. He feeds the King some of his daughter-in-law's simply-made buttermilk griddle cakes. He tells the King about the loss of each of his children, and that all he has left is his daughter-in-law, his little four-year-old granddaughter, and his two mules ('Beauty' and 'Shock'). What Malouf has masterfully done in this part of the novel is to help the King reestablish his connection with his own humanity and the land around him. It is precisely the preparation that he needs in order to be successful in his upcoming supplication to Achilles.
I don't want to say too much more about the meeting between Priam and Achilles, as it really is the climax of the novel, but suffice it to say that it is an emotionally riveting experience. With tears in my eyes, I found myself almost holding my breath as the two men quietly talk in a dark corner of Achilles' tent in the middle of the night. It is heart-wrenching stuff. I do want to share just a bit of Malouf's beautiful writing of this intimate meeting too, especially these few words from Priam--
I suppose that there is always the danger of trying to retell even a portion of a story that is so well-known as The Iliad. I submit that Malouf has not run that risk here at all, and has not over-reached one-jot in telling this powerful story. This compact novel, with its Homericly noble prose, is rich with pathos, emotion, empathy, compassion and humanity. It is not the story of the gods and goddesses; no, it is the story of humans and human failings and feelings. Most of all I think it is the story of the triumph of the human spirit even in the depths of despair and tragedy. Priam takes a chance to retrieve his son and finds his humanity. Achilles takes a chance by giving up his rage and finds his inner peace and redemption. Nearly three-thousand years later we still weep for and admire both of these men for what they suffered and went through. Malouf's superbly well-written Ransom poignantly and touchingly reinforces those feelings we harbor in our hearts, but may not have fully understood why.
I highly recommend this novel, and unhesitatingly award it five of five stars. If you do read this novel at some point, and I sincerely hope you will, please consider going back and reviewing the books of The Iliad that I referenced in the opening paragraph. When you finish reading David Malouf's Ransom, please drop me a note and let me know what you thought.
***
Malouf's novel takes as its inspiration a series of events that occur near the end of Homer's The Iliad (my review of the Fagles translation of The Iliad can be found here), including the following: the death of Achilles' friend Patroclus (Book 16), Achilles' killing of Hector (Book 22), the funeral of Patroclus (Book 23), and Priam's late-night visit to Achilles to beg for the return of his son's body (Book 24). With little more than passing references in his novel, Malouf wisely leaves it to Homer to tell the story of the first three events, and instead focuses most of his book on the last--that of the Trojan King, Priam, and his efforts to claim his son's body from Achilles. Homer's description of Priam's meeting with Achilles is, in my opinion, the most emotionally charged and powerful scene in the whole poem. In his novel, Malouf, the poet/author, lyrically and tenderly delves into the psychology of the grieving warrior over the loss of his friend, and the grieving father and his efforts to retrieve the body of his slain son. While this is surely one of the saddest stories I have read of late, at the same time the reader cannot help but be buoyed up by Malouf's beautiful portrayal of the innate sense of decency, goodness, and the inherent need for redemption that resides in each of us--even in the face of great adversity and tragedy.
My impression of the Trojan War comes from reading The Iliad, and largely seems to be nothing more than a game board set up on a table and surrounded by the pantheon of gods and goddesses who reached down and pushed playing pieces about; with one side gaining a brief advantage, and then the other. The upshot was that for ten long years the war between the Achaeans and Trojans reeled back and forth across the Scamander Plain outside of the walls of Troy, and resulted in the bloody slaughter of hundreds, if not thousands, of Greeks and Trojans alike. Reading The Iliad left me with the overwhelming feeling that it all seemed preordained, and that the story just had to play out as foretold. What Malouf does so brilliantly in Ransom is to 'liberate' a portion of this epic tragic tale from the control of the gods and Fate, and gives the power of 'free choice' and decision-making to two of the primary protagonists--Priam and Achilles.
For ten days in a row, following the death of Hector in single-combat with Achilles, Priam and the Trojans have watched Achilles drag Hector's body behind his chariot around the funeral mound of his slain friend, Patroclus. Finally, Priam can take it no longer, he must do something. Late one night he has a vision of something "new" occurring. He sees that he must go to Achilles, not as King of Troy, but as the father of a dead son, and appeal to him man-to-man for the body of his son. He will ride to the Achaean camp without all of the trappings of his authority on an old and unadorned cart pulled by two mules with an old grey-haired Trojan country rustic as the cart-driver.
A goodly portion of this little novel is the story of the carter, Somax, and Priam and their journey out of the city and through the countryside to the Achaean camp. The two old men begin to get to know one another, and slowly but surely develop a tremendous amount of empathy for one another. After a few hours of slow plodding in the wagon, Somax stops at the bank of the river they have to ford and has the King wade out into the river just to feel the coolness of the water. He feeds the King some of his daughter-in-law's simply-made buttermilk griddle cakes. He tells the King about the loss of each of his children, and that all he has left is his daughter-in-law, his little four-year-old granddaughter, and his two mules ('Beauty' and 'Shock'). What Malouf has masterfully done in this part of the novel is to help the King reestablish his connection with his own humanity and the land around him. It is precisely the preparation that he needs in order to be successful in his upcoming supplication to Achilles.
I don't want to say too much more about the meeting between Priam and Achilles, as it really is the climax of the novel, but suffice it to say that it is an emotionally riveting experience. With tears in my eyes, I found myself almost holding my breath as the two men quietly talk in a dark corner of Achilles' tent in the middle of the night. It is heart-wrenching stuff. I do want to share just a bit of Malouf's beautiful writing of this intimate meeting too, especially these few words from Priam--
"'Achilles,' he says, his voice steady now, 'you know, as I do, what we men are. We are mortals, not gods. We die. Death is in our nature. Without that fee paid in advance, the world does not come to us. That is the hard bargain life makes with us--with all of us, every one--and the condition we share. And for that reason, if for no other, we should have pity for one another's losses. For the sorrows that must come sooner or later to each one of us, in a world we enter only on mortal terms."Upon reading this I suddenly realized that Malouf wants us to realize, just as Priam and Achilles have, that being Human, and therefore mortal, is better than being one of the Immortals. Humans, with all of our warts and short-comings, have reasons to live and love, reasons to do the right things, and reasons to make our brief lives mean something that might be remembered through the ages, or even just for a few moments. Homer, through The Iliad, makes us remember Achilles and King Priam, and Malouf's novel helps us better understand why we should.
I suppose that there is always the danger of trying to retell even a portion of a story that is so well-known as The Iliad. I submit that Malouf has not run that risk here at all, and has not over-reached one-jot in telling this powerful story. This compact novel, with its Homericly noble prose, is rich with pathos, emotion, empathy, compassion and humanity. It is not the story of the gods and goddesses; no, it is the story of humans and human failings and feelings. Most of all I think it is the story of the triumph of the human spirit even in the depths of despair and tragedy. Priam takes a chance to retrieve his son and finds his humanity. Achilles takes a chance by giving up his rage and finds his inner peace and redemption. Nearly three-thousand years later we still weep for and admire both of these men for what they suffered and went through. Malouf's superbly well-written Ransom poignantly and touchingly reinforces those feelings we harbor in our hearts, but may not have fully understood why.
I highly recommend this novel, and unhesitatingly award it five of five stars. If you do read this novel at some point, and I sincerely hope you will, please consider going back and reviewing the books of The Iliad that I referenced in the opening paragraph. When you finish reading David Malouf's Ransom, please drop me a note and let me know what you thought.
***
Labels:
21st century,
Achilles,
australian author,
book reviews,
contemporary literature,
David Malouf,
historical fiction,
must read novel,
personal favorite,
Priam,
Ransom,
reviews,
The Iliad,
trojan war
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


