I know, I know, you're probably getting mighty tired of my postings on The Iliad by now. I'm almost done, I promise. I only have one major translation left to read, and I'm not getting to it until early next week while I'm on a three-day business trip to Santa Fe, New Mexico. Having said that though, I thought I'd spend some time putting together a posting that compares and contrasts the translations that I have read, and also provide some suggestions for some pleasurable side reading. This information may prove useful to readers who want to tackle Homer's epic poem, and are wondering which translation to read. It may also be interesting to those who've read The Iliad and are considering reading a different translation at some point in time. I am going to list the translations that I've read organized by date of translation and/or publication.
Richmond Lattimore (1951)--
This is, of the modern translations, probably the most classical, formal, and elegant rendition. Lattimore uses what he calls a "free six-beat line" in his verse translation of Homer's dactylic hexameter verse of the original Greek. Based upon all that I've read about these translations, Lattimore was ruthlessly faithful to the Greek spellings of places and names, and utilization of the formal epithets (e.g., "grey-eyed" for Athena, or "father of gods" for Zeus, etc.) when describing the cast-of-characters. It is colorful and incredibly descriptive stuff to read. If you love Homer, and specifically The Iliad, Lattimore's poetic interpretation is one that you should eventually read. It is the 'Elder Big Brother' of modern 20th century Iliads.
Robert Fitzgerald (1974)--
Fitzgerald's translation reads easier, in my opinion, than Lattimore's. This is a qualitative statement on my part, and is probably more a function of the kind of reader that I am these days. Fitzgerald also doesn't include all of the repetition that the original Greek text has, as this is really a relict of The Iliad's oral tradition. Fitzgerald chose blank verse as the meter for his translation, and it really does seem to correspond better to the dactylic hexameter of the Greek than using English hexameter or rhymed verse. While Fitzgerald's blank verse reads very, very well, it still manages to sound traditional and is not flamboyant at all--it is simply good poetry. I have to say that 'at the end of the day' I really enjoyed the Fitzgerald translation.
Robert Fagles (1990)--
The translation of The Iliad by Robert Fagles was the first one that I read cover-to-cover, and it really was a life-altering experience, and the beginning of my love-affair with Homer and all-things 'Iliadic'. Fagles believed in the performance-driven aspects of The Iliad, and he did his very best to emphasize this element with his translation. Fagles did a terrific job at translating the Greek into his lines of verse that maintain a lyrical and rhythmic five or six beats per line while maintaining a very sensible and readable text. As I read his translation I found myself completely caught up in the beauty of the mythology, and fully able to experience the pathos, drama, and tragedy of this great story. I have to say that by the time I was finished with this translation, my overall reading experience was something approaching the sublime. I guess I'll probably always be partial to Fagles' translation as 'it was my first'. Finally, I should note that the Introduction to the Fagles translation was written by Bernard Knox and is simply magnificent in its own right and a 'must-read' for any reader of Homer and The Iliad.
Stanley Lombardo (1997)--
Lombardo's translation was fun to read! Apparently, Lombardo is very interested in restoring the oral tradition associated with people experiencing Homer and The Iliad and The Odyssey. His translations very much lend themselves to being read aloud and hearing (and even feeling) the lyricism and rhythms of the words and verse. In fact, it is my understanding that Lombardo does performances of various books of The Iliad on the stage for audiences (would I ever love to attend one of these!). Frankly, Lombardo's translation begs to be read aloud and shared with others. Trust me, it works in a similar fashion for the reader reading it alone too--it is a performance on every page!
I also really liked how Lombardo inset and italicized the similes in the poem (and there's gobs of 'em). It makes it so much easier for the reader to relate each simile to section of the poem it applies to. It was really quite clever (and makes it ever so much easier when reading aloud). Lombardo is a firm believer that The Iliad is a living poem (after all, it has been translated into English approximately 150 times since the 17th century!), and that "living poetry means living speech". I completely agree. For new readers, or readers who might be unsure of whether they'd like The Iliad, this might be a great translation to start with. If you're an Iliad junkie, like me, you ought to read it too. Lombardo's translation is powerful and relevant.
Stephen Mitchell (2011)--
Stay tuned! I do plan to provide a review of Mitchell's new translation (October 2011) some time in the next couple of weeks. I have it sitting on the TBR shelf right now, and I plan on starting it early next week while on my business trip. Apparently, Mitchell has utilized a relatively recent reworking of the Greek text by the scholar, Martin West. If you're interested in this new translation by Stephen Mitchell, you can read about it in an earlier posting of mine here. I'm pretty excited to read this and compare and contrast it with the other versions I've read. It should be really interesting.
Bonus Material--
If you read The Iliad, any of the translations referenced above, or others, I also strongly recommend that you consider picking up the following books. I think they'll add significantly to your overall experience with Homer and his epic poem.
The Odyssey--Obviously, if you've read The Iliad, you probably ought to go ahead and read The Odyssey. All of the translators referenced above have translations of The Odyssey, with exception of Stephen Mitchell, and he's working on his rendition even as I write.
Ransom--This little book by Australian writer, David Malouf, is seriously one of the most gorgeous works of fiction I've ever encountered. It focuses and expands upon events occurring in the last three or four books of The Iliad. It is hauntingly beautiful and powerful prose that borders on poetic for much of the time. If you're interested in Malouf's novel, you can check out my review here.
War Music, All Day Permanent Red, and Cold Calls--These little books of poetry by British poet, Christopher Logue, are his retelling of significant portions of The Iliad and are not to be missed. Once you've read The Iliad, dip into War Music and prepare to be 'gobsmacked' up side the head! If you're interested in Logue's poetry, have a look at my posting here.
The War That Killed Achilles--This non-fiction book by Caroline Alexander (2009) is superb, and places Homer's epic poem in historical context. It is just over 200 pages, and is extremely well written. I am so glad that I read this as it really shed a lot of light on the events associated with the Trojan War, as well as the psychology of the major players.
A Brief Iliadic Glossary--
Some interesting words and definitions that I've encountered during my reads:
androktasia = combat death description (these abound within The Iliad)
aristeia = display of martial prowess (e.g., Book 5 is the aristeia of Diomedes)
eris = refers to 'strife between heroes' (mortal or immortal)
teichoskopia = viewing from the walls (refers to Helen and Priam up on the walls of Troy looking down on the Greek commanders)
***
pro se = L. "for oneself."
prose = L. 'prosa.' the ordinary language people use is speaking or writing: a prosaic style, quality, or condition.
The Journal of My Travels through the World's Great Literature
Showing posts with label robert fagles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label robert fagles. Show all posts
October 20, 2011
September 21, 2011
News Flash: A New "Iliad" is Coming Soon!
"Hello! My name is Chris, and I am addicted to Homer." I have made it my business over the past couple of years to find and read copies of all of the major translations of Homer's The Iliad and The Odyssey. While I very much love the elegant and classy translations by Richmond Lattimore (The Iliad, 1951; The Odyssey, 1965), I'd have to say that my current favorites are those by the late Robert Fagles (The Iliad, 1990; The Odyssey, 1996). In my opinion, the Fagles translations are eminently readable and enthralling, and it is my understanding that he did a truly masterful job of adapting the original meaning of the Greek into the idiom of Modern English. Well, at any rate, it sure works for me!
Anyway, I've just recently become aware of a new translation of Homer's The Iliad by Stephen Mitchell that is being released on October 11, 2011, published by Free Press. From the reviews I've managed to find and read, Mitchell is well qualified and up to the task of giving the world this new translation of The Iliad. In fact, a publication release I found on-line may provide a bit of the back-story of why Mitchell felt compelled to tackle his own translation of this epic poem--
"Mitchell’s Iliad is the first translation based on the work of the preeminent Homeric scholar Martin L. West, whose edition of the original Greek identifies many passages that were added after the Iliad was first written down, to the detriment of the music and the story. Omitting these hundreds of interpolated lines restores a dramatically sharper, leaner text. In addition, Mitchell’s illuminating introduction opens the epic still further to our understanding and appreciation."Well, I for one, can't wait to get my grubby little paws on a brand-spanking-new hardcover edition of this book and dive in and form my own opinion. I'm also seriously contemplating picking up my well-read copy of Fagles' translation and giving it a reread over the next couple of weeks, just so I'll have something to compare and contrast.
Finally, I've just found out that Stephen Mitchell is coming to the independent bookseller, Vroman's Bookstore, in Pasadena on Saturday, November 5th at 4:00 p.m., for a book-signing and discussion of his new translation of The Iliad. Yup, you guessed it, I'll be there. Wouldn't miss it for the world!
November 4, 2010
"The Odyssey" by Homer and "The Penelopiad" by Margaret Atwood
Well, you're gonna get a 'two-fer' tonight; a review of Homer's The Odyssey (translation by Robert Fagles), and Margaret Atwood's brilliant little novella, The Penelopiad. Secondly, I am sharing this with the Literary Blog Hop at The Blue Bookcase. These women are writing and promoting some very fine book reviews. I encourage you to go their blog and have a look. I have learned to truly love the cross-pollination that occurs on the world-wide-web; particularly when it comes to the books we read and our impressions. Think about it for a moment, but where do we really learn about most of the books we read? Yup, from other people.
Some of you may be aware, but I read Homer's The Iliad recently and loved it (my review here). I figured that the smart thing to do was to go ahead and just follow it up with a reading of Robert Fagles's 1996 translation of The Odyssey.Robert Fagles's translation is a modern and contemporary, yet extraordinarily lyrical translation that just seems to preserve the classical feel of Homer, i.e., it begs to be read aloud. This puts the reader squarely in the midst of the Homeric oral tradition of the itinerant bard and the hexameter verse structure of this ancient epic poem. Fagles has masterfully brought this feeling to his English translation. Now it is time for a 'Warning' from the Management--If you haven't read The Odyssey before, and are truly concerned about plot spoilers, I suggest you toddle along and find another blog posting to read right now.
The Odyssey is a nearly three-thousand year old 12,000 line poem that tells the tale of the Greek warrior, Odysseus, and his return from Asia-Minor following the sack of Troy. While it took the Achaean army ten years to defeat Troy, it takes Odysseus ten more years to return home to his island kingdom of Ithaka. Suffice it to say that Odysseus has nearly every adventure that you're likely to imagine, and then some, during his journey before he reaches his home. This is a rollicking good read with loads of action-packed hand-to-hand combat, scary monsters, femme fatales, and damsels in distress.
Intermingled with the story of Odysseus's macho-man Mediterranean cruise is the concurrent tale of his patient, but suffering, wife, Penelope, holding down the fort on Ithaka. She is not only trying to raise their surly teen-aged son, Telemakus, but simultaneously fending off the less than honorable advances of the hordes of suitors who now assume that Odysseus is dead and want to take over his kingdom (and wife).
Meanwhile, during the course of all of his mad-cap adventures, Odysseus is called upon to use every ounce of his guile and inventiveness to outwit his foes and safely return to Ithaka to his wife and son and the host of suitors pursuing Penelope and looking to supplant him. And deal with them he does. Near the end of the poem Odysseus and Telemakus go on a premeditated spree of horrific violence and slaughter all of Penelope's dastardly suitors and her twelve palace maids. It ain't pretty, folks; nope, not at all. This is bloody in-your-face killing Homeric style, and a lot like today's video games.
Reading The Odyssey will not only keep you enthralled from the first page to the last--and it is an amazing travelogue after all--but it will cause you to dip into your Bullfinch's or Hamilton's mythology too. Reading The Odyssey is quite like peeling an onion--layer after layer--one story leading to the discovery of another related myth. Also, do pay attention to the bits about Penelope and her defense of the homefront. This will become important in the next part of this posting as I review Margaret Atwood's marvelous little novella, The Penelopiad.
If you haven't read Homer's great epic, The Odyssey, I simply can't recommend it enough. I strongly suggest reading The Iliad first though. They go together, like hand-in-glove. I also strongly recommend reading the translations of Robert Fagles of both of these classic epic poems. I recently read Richmond Lattimore's translations; and while very beautifully done, I truly believe that the Fagles translations are the renditions for our time. For The Odyssey, I award five stars out of five, a genuine classic.
***
Okay, now lets turn our attention to Margaret Atwood's 2005 novel, The Penelopiad. At just under two-hundred pages, I read this novella in one sitting, and enjoyed it immensely! Also, having just finished reading Robert Fagles' marvelous translation of Homer's The Odyssey, finding and reading The Penelopiad seemed more than serendipitous. This is a retelling of The Odyssey from the perspective of Odysseus's wife, the 'patient' Penelope. Atwood uses humor, pathos, and a significant dose of imagination and creativity to tell the story of Penelope and the twelve maids. With one of the niftiest opening lines I've read in some time, this is an innovative piece of modern writing that finds Atwood cleverly reaching back to the ancient Greek dramatists as she structures the entire book as an ancient classical drama, with the interesting literary device of the 'Twelve Maids' providing the voice of the Chorus. The Chorus of the Maids interjects quite frequently (eleven chapters) in the midst of Penelope's soliloquy (eighteen chapters) to share their perspective of Penelope, Odysseus, and the on-going events in the palace on Ithaka. Some of these choral interludes include bits of funny poetic doggerel, a lyrical and well-written lamentation, a folk song, an idyll, a sea shanty, a ballad, a drama, an anthropology lecture, a court trial, and a love song. I have to say that each of these choral interludes works very well in bringing to life these twelve, largely unknown, maids.At first blush the reader might be tempted to dismiss this little book as nothing more than a light-hearted bit of fun that Atwood has at the expense of elements of Homer's great epic. In my opinion, that would be a mistake though. There's a lot going on in this book, and much of it doesn't manifest itself immediately. I re-read it this morning on the train to the office, and I'm now even more in awe of Atwood's talent as a writer. While acknowledging the patriarchal and male-centric tone of The Odyssey, Atwood in her The Penelopiad has brilliantly explored the feminine side of the Palace of Ithaka, as well as in Hades (the Underworld) where Penelope; her cousin, Helen-of-Troy; and the maids now all reside. Atwood tastefully, but emphatically, uses her brief little tale to illustrate the double-standard that existed between men and women, not only that contained in the oral tradition of Homer's epics, but that of the ancient classical world. After my recent reading of Homer, I found her use of a completely different voice and gender to tell the story of Odysseus' return to his home after twenty years, and the horrific violence he inflicts on 'the suitors', as well as the Twelve Maids, to be simply fascinating. Also, while Homer goes to great lengths to highlight Odysseus as the "trickster", "dissembler", and "tactician", Atwood is equally successful in causing the reader to continually sift through Penelope's thoughts and statements for the kernels of Truth in her story, and in this task it is sometimes wise to pay attention to the Chorus.
Is The Penelopiad intended to be a feminist interpretation of Penelope, or The Odyssey? No, I really don't think so. This wonderful novella seems to be nothing more than Atwood's contribution to the Canongate Myth Series (a terrific series of books, by the way), and simply addresses the Odyssean mythology from the perspective of one female protagonist and a series of events that have received little scholarly or literary attention prior to this. Having said that though, I found the book to be a very well written and cleverly constructed story by one of Canada's great living authors. In sum, I thoroughly enjoyed The Penelopiad, and I'm quite glad that it has taken up a permanent home on my shelves. For me, this book rates a solid four stars out of five.
***
October 8, 2010
Review: "The Iliad" By Homer (Translated by Robert Fagles)
"Homer makes us Hearers, and Virgil leaves us Readers." So wrote Alexander Pope, in 1715, in the preface to his translation of The Iliad.
I have just completed reading a magnificent translation of Homer's The Iliad, and couldn't have enjoyed the experience more. I had read bits and pieces of The Iliad over the course of my life, but I had never read the entire poem from start to finish. I recently purchased the Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition of a translation by Robert Fagles that was completed in 1990. While I am not qualified to compare or judge the work of one translator versus that of another, I can say that I truly enjoyed Fagles' lyrical translation that largely maintains the hexameter verse structure (i.e., six beats per line) of the original Greek texts. For a six-hundred page poem, it was eminently readable, and a darn good story too!
Simply put, The Iliad is the story of the last year of the ten-year long Trojan War, long thought to have been fought between the Achaean (Greek) forces and the Trojans in the 12th or 11th century BCE. The Iliad is thought to be about 2,700 years old and is, in essence, a transcript of an epic poem in hexameter verse that was originally shared via an oral or bardic tradition. As I was reading the poem, I couldn't help but stop and imagine a traveling story-teller stopping in a small village, and standing in the village square next to a bonfire at night and recounting this tale to a rapt and wide-eyed audience.
In some respects, The Iliad could have been easily titled "The Rage of Achilles" (and indeed, that is the title of Book One). The poem opens with Achilles, and it essentially concludes with Achilles. In between is recounted the tales of the battles of egos among the primary characters and among most, if not all, of the gods on Mount Olympus. For example, the Greek leader, Agamemnon, and the Greek's greatest warrior, Achilles clearly don't like one another; and this initially leads to significant problems for the Greeks as they battle Hector and his Trojan battalions. Similarly, on the Trojan side, Hector doesn't think much of his younger brother, the "magnificent" Paris (a simpering dilettante). Unfortunately, for the Greeks, because of his ongoing 'tiff' with Agamemnon, Achilles sits on the beach drinking wine and sulking for much of the poem, and doesn't enter the fray until his best friend, Patroclus, is killed in combat with Hector. Once Achilles commits to the fight though, he becomes the true definition of a 'berserker,' and is clearly the indomitable and heroic warrior; although I have to say that Diomedes and Great Ajax are pretty darned impressive fighters too!
I very much enjoyed how the poem wove in the politics and actions of the gods and goddesses as they continually intervened and influenced the human protagonists during the course of the tale. Some of the gods side with the Achaeans (e.g., Hera, Athena, Poseidon, Thetis, etc.), and others with the Trojans (e.g., Ares, Apollo, Aphrodite, etc.), with Zeus paternally watching over them all. The poem also makes quite the point of describing the hubris, selfishness, deceit, and the treachery behavior exhibited by both mortals and immortals alike. While the poem assigns the blame for the Trojan War on Paris' abduction of Menelaus' wife, Helen (i.e., "the face that launched a thousand ships"), I happen to think the poem also implies that the war was fought because of prideful stubbornness on both sides. Also, from a historical perspective, I have to wonder if the Trojan War really wasn't the result of a Greek desire to expand its hegemony for simple economic reasons--i.e., to control the trade routes through the Aegean Sea. Anyway, it doesn't matter, it was simply grand to read the poem and to be completely swept up in the drama and passion of it all.
I must caution readers that The Iliad contains some of the most savage, intense, and vivid combat imagery that I have ever encountered in literature. This ain't your typical 'So-and-so slew So-and-so' nondescript poetic characterization. Oh no, this is gory, explicit, and very descriptive writing that tells precisely where the great bronze spearhead struck some poor fellow, and then what it did to his body, face, or internal organs. After one reads The Iliad, one realizes that hand-to-hand combat and butchery with spears, swords, bows and arrows, chariots, and rocks and clubs is a very personal business, messy and very, very dangerous.
I suppose that one's experience with reading The Iliad is influenced by the particular translation that you pick up, and there are a great number of them out there. I chose the translation by Robert Fagles, largely based upon reading reviews and my own experience reading his translation of Aeschylus' The Oresteia. Fagles' translation of The Iliad, for me was just magical and the poem seemed alive with richness in a contemporary framework that I could readily understand. As I mentioned above, his translation is quite lyrical and loosely maintains a meter of five- and six-beats per line throughout. Read it aloud, it just rolls off of the tongue, and becomes simply enchanting.
I wanted to provide a couple of examples of the poetic flavor of The Iliad for you to experience. The first example is from Book 4: "The Truce Erupts In War" and is a description of the Greek Army advancing across the Scamander Plain to meet the Trojan Army in combat--
"As a heavy surf assaults some roaring coast,
piling breaker on breaker whipped by the West Wind,
and out on the open sea a crest first rears its head
and then pounds down on the shore with hoarse, rumbling thunder
and in come more shouldering crests, arching up and breaking
against some rocky spit, exploding salt foam to the skies--
so wave on wave they came, Achaean battalions ceaseless,
surging on to war." (Book 4: Lines 489-496)
One can almost imagine the soldiers, shoulder to shoulder, spears pointed forward, rank upon rank, advancing across the dusty plain, screaming and bellowing at the top of their lungs as they move toward their Trojan foes. What a terrifying sight it must have been!
The next sample I want to provide is from the last book of The Iliad, and recounts the late-night meeting between Achilles and the Trojan King, Priam. I don't want to spoil the poem for any first-time readers, but suffice it to say that Priam is there for a very important reason; and after nearly ten years of war, the two adversaries sit together talking in Achilles' tent late at night. It is truly a tender, touching, and most poignant scene; especially this almost pensive reflection on the human cost of the war that Achilles shares with King Priam--
"Come, please, sit down on this chair here...
Let us put our griefs to rest in our own hearts,
rake them up no more, raw as we are with mourning.
What good's to be won from tears that chill the spirit?
So the immortals spun our lives that we, we wretched men
live on to bear such torments--the gods live free of sorrows.
There are two great jars that stand on the floor of Zeus's halls
and hold his gifts, our miseries in one, the other blessings.
When Zeus who loves the lightning mixes gifts for a man,
now he meets with misfortune, now good times in turn.
When Zeus dispenses gifts from the jar of sorrows only,
he makes a man an outcast--brutal, ravenous hunger
drives him down the face of the shining earth,
stalking far and wide, cursed by gods and men."
(Book 24: Lines 609-622)
So, so sad; and somehow one suddenly realizes that Achilles has become a very, very wise young man.
Almost 3,000 years ago, the Human Race was given a gift--a great gift from a largely unknown itinerant poet--The Iliad. It is a treasure for all humanity. Read it, think about it, learn from it, and most of all pass it on--tell this great story to all who will listen. It is their story too.
***
I have just completed reading a magnificent translation of Homer's The Iliad, and couldn't have enjoyed the experience more. I had read bits and pieces of The Iliad over the course of my life, but I had never read the entire poem from start to finish. I recently purchased the Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition of a translation by Robert Fagles that was completed in 1990. While I am not qualified to compare or judge the work of one translator versus that of another, I can say that I truly enjoyed Fagles' lyrical translation that largely maintains the hexameter verse structure (i.e., six beats per line) of the original Greek texts. For a six-hundred page poem, it was eminently readable, and a darn good story too!
Simply put, The Iliad is the story of the last year of the ten-year long Trojan War, long thought to have been fought between the Achaean (Greek) forces and the Trojans in the 12th or 11th century BCE. The Iliad is thought to be about 2,700 years old and is, in essence, a transcript of an epic poem in hexameter verse that was originally shared via an oral or bardic tradition. As I was reading the poem, I couldn't help but stop and imagine a traveling story-teller stopping in a small village, and standing in the village square next to a bonfire at night and recounting this tale to a rapt and wide-eyed audience.
In some respects, The Iliad could have been easily titled "The Rage of Achilles" (and indeed, that is the title of Book One). The poem opens with Achilles, and it essentially concludes with Achilles. In between is recounted the tales of the battles of egos among the primary characters and among most, if not all, of the gods on Mount Olympus. For example, the Greek leader, Agamemnon, and the Greek's greatest warrior, Achilles clearly don't like one another; and this initially leads to significant problems for the Greeks as they battle Hector and his Trojan battalions. Similarly, on the Trojan side, Hector doesn't think much of his younger brother, the "magnificent" Paris (a simpering dilettante). Unfortunately, for the Greeks, because of his ongoing 'tiff' with Agamemnon, Achilles sits on the beach drinking wine and sulking for much of the poem, and doesn't enter the fray until his best friend, Patroclus, is killed in combat with Hector. Once Achilles commits to the fight though, he becomes the true definition of a 'berserker,' and is clearly the indomitable and heroic warrior; although I have to say that Diomedes and Great Ajax are pretty darned impressive fighters too!
I very much enjoyed how the poem wove in the politics and actions of the gods and goddesses as they continually intervened and influenced the human protagonists during the course of the tale. Some of the gods side with the Achaeans (e.g., Hera, Athena, Poseidon, Thetis, etc.), and others with the Trojans (e.g., Ares, Apollo, Aphrodite, etc.), with Zeus paternally watching over them all. The poem also makes quite the point of describing the hubris, selfishness, deceit, and the treachery behavior exhibited by both mortals and immortals alike. While the poem assigns the blame for the Trojan War on Paris' abduction of Menelaus' wife, Helen (i.e., "the face that launched a thousand ships"), I happen to think the poem also implies that the war was fought because of prideful stubbornness on both sides. Also, from a historical perspective, I have to wonder if the Trojan War really wasn't the result of a Greek desire to expand its hegemony for simple economic reasons--i.e., to control the trade routes through the Aegean Sea. Anyway, it doesn't matter, it was simply grand to read the poem and to be completely swept up in the drama and passion of it all.
I must caution readers that The Iliad contains some of the most savage, intense, and vivid combat imagery that I have ever encountered in literature. This ain't your typical 'So-and-so slew So-and-so' nondescript poetic characterization. Oh no, this is gory, explicit, and very descriptive writing that tells precisely where the great bronze spearhead struck some poor fellow, and then what it did to his body, face, or internal organs. After one reads The Iliad, one realizes that hand-to-hand combat and butchery with spears, swords, bows and arrows, chariots, and rocks and clubs is a very personal business, messy and very, very dangerous.I suppose that one's experience with reading The Iliad is influenced by the particular translation that you pick up, and there are a great number of them out there. I chose the translation by Robert Fagles, largely based upon reading reviews and my own experience reading his translation of Aeschylus' The Oresteia. Fagles' translation of The Iliad, for me was just magical and the poem seemed alive with richness in a contemporary framework that I could readily understand. As I mentioned above, his translation is quite lyrical and loosely maintains a meter of five- and six-beats per line throughout. Read it aloud, it just rolls off of the tongue, and becomes simply enchanting.
I wanted to provide a couple of examples of the poetic flavor of The Iliad for you to experience. The first example is from Book 4: "The Truce Erupts In War" and is a description of the Greek Army advancing across the Scamander Plain to meet the Trojan Army in combat--
"As a heavy surf assaults some roaring coast,
piling breaker on breaker whipped by the West Wind,
and out on the open sea a crest first rears its head
and then pounds down on the shore with hoarse, rumbling thunder
and in come more shouldering crests, arching up and breaking
against some rocky spit, exploding salt foam to the skies--
so wave on wave they came, Achaean battalions ceaseless,
surging on to war." (Book 4: Lines 489-496)
One can almost imagine the soldiers, shoulder to shoulder, spears pointed forward, rank upon rank, advancing across the dusty plain, screaming and bellowing at the top of their lungs as they move toward their Trojan foes. What a terrifying sight it must have been!
The next sample I want to provide is from the last book of The Iliad, and recounts the late-night meeting between Achilles and the Trojan King, Priam. I don't want to spoil the poem for any first-time readers, but suffice it to say that Priam is there for a very important reason; and after nearly ten years of war, the two adversaries sit together talking in Achilles' tent late at night. It is truly a tender, touching, and most poignant scene; especially this almost pensive reflection on the human cost of the war that Achilles shares with King Priam--
"Come, please, sit down on this chair here...
Let us put our griefs to rest in our own hearts,
rake them up no more, raw as we are with mourning.
What good's to be won from tears that chill the spirit?
So the immortals spun our lives that we, we wretched men
live on to bear such torments--the gods live free of sorrows.
There are two great jars that stand on the floor of Zeus's halls
and hold his gifts, our miseries in one, the other blessings.
When Zeus who loves the lightning mixes gifts for a man,
now he meets with misfortune, now good times in turn.
When Zeus dispenses gifts from the jar of sorrows only,
he makes a man an outcast--brutal, ravenous hunger
drives him down the face of the shining earth,
stalking far and wide, cursed by gods and men."
(Book 24: Lines 609-622)
So, so sad; and somehow one suddenly realizes that Achilles has become a very, very wise young man.
Almost 3,000 years ago, the Human Race was given a gift--a great gift from a largely unknown itinerant poet--The Iliad. It is a treasure for all humanity. Read it, think about it, learn from it, and most of all pass it on--tell this great story to all who will listen. It is their story too.
***
Labels:
Achilles,
bardic tradition,
classical literature,
Greek epic poem,
Hector,
Homer,
oral tradition,
poetry,
robert fagles,
The Iliad,
the western canon,
translation,
trojan war,
western canon
October 1, 2010
Book Beginnings on Friday
Book Beginnings on Friday is a meme hosted by Becky at Page Turners. Anyone can participate; just share the opening sentence of your current read, making sure that you include the title and author so others know what you're reading. If you like, share with everyone why you do, or do not, like the sentence.
This week's book beginning sentence comes from The Iliad by Homer (translated by Robert Fagles)--
I wish you all a wonderful weekend, and Happy Reading!
This week's book beginning sentence comes from The Iliad by Homer (translated by Robert Fagles)--
"Rage--Goddess, sing the rage of Peleus' son Achilles, murderous, doomed, that cost the Achaeans countless losses, hurling down to the House of Death so many sturdy souls, great fighters' souls, but made their bodies carrion, feasts for the dogs and birds, and the will of Zeus was moving toward its end." (Book One: Lines 1-6)This is an awesome translation! I have come to profoundly admire Robert Fagles's skill at translating the Greek classics and giving them life and lyricism for new generations. I am also participating in a group-read of Fagles' translation of The Oresteia by Aeschylus in one of my book groups on Goodreads (see my earlier review of The Oresteia here). My version of The Iliad is the Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition, 1998, 683 pp. I also highly recommend Fagles' translation of The Odyssey.
I wish you all a wonderful weekend, and Happy Reading!
September 24, 2010
Review: "Agamemnon" from "The Oresteia" By Aeschylus
I am in the midst of participating in a group read and discussion of Aeschylus' extraordinary trilogy of plays known as The Oresteia with one of my on-line groups on Goodreads. First of all, I need to acknowledge that I am pretty much a neophyte when it comes to any form of study of the great written works of antiquity, and this applies even more so to any of the surviving examples of ancient Greek drama. I am currently in the process of remedying this woeful deficiency. Sure, like most of us, I was required to read bits and pieces of The Iliad and The Odyssey in high school, but I don't recall ever having picked up any of the great classic plays of antiquity.
I also want to point out that with all of the reading that I have done over the course of my adult life I have encountered countless references and allusions to various ancient literary works, and I have always had to sheepishly read over that reference or allusion and therefore not fully comprehending the point. Clearly, many of the authors of the great literature that we all read and love so much owe a great deal to these earlier poets and authors of antiquity for the classic essays, poems, and dramas that have survived. One immediately thinks of Shakespeare, Keats, Shelley, Byron, Tennyson, George Eliot, Thomas Hardy, and William Butler Yeats, just to name a few, as representatives of those who've relied upon and embraced that ancient story-telling tradition in their own works. I finally came to the realization that in order to fully understand and appreciate many of the world's great literary works, that I needed to spend some time studying these earlier classics, including the ancient Greek canon. This was my rationale for joining my on-line group in the discussion and analysis of The Oresteia by Aeschylus.
It is generally believed that Aeschylus was born near Athens in 525 B.C. of a noble family. It appears that Aeschylus fought with the Greek army in its classic battle against the invading Persian army at the Battle of Marathon. Over the course of his life, Aeschylus wrote more than seventy plays, of which only seven have survived in one form or another. Three of those surviving seven plays make up The Oresteia and were written by Aeschylus in 458 B.C., two years before his death in 456 B.C., at the age of sixty-nine years old, at Gela in Sicily.
The Oresteia is unique in that it is the only surviving example of the ancient tradition of the usual trilogy of Greek tragic drama. The fourth part of The Oresteia that Aeschylus would have originally presented as the normal Greek dramatic tetralogy, the satyr-play, was entitled Proteus; and would have presented the gods and heroes in comic situations that would have lightened the mood of the audience following its viewing of the preceding three tragedies. Unfortunately, The Oresteia's satyr-play has not survived. The three tragedies that comprise The Oresteia include: Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers, and The Eumenides. Collectively, the three plays tell the story of a royal family, the House of Atreus of Argos, and its journey from a dark and bleak legacy of treachery and vengeance to the establishment of a process for formal determination and atonement of guilt through the use of a trial and jury--the process that we now know as Justice. In essence, the three plays recount Aeschylus' allegorical telling of the history of the Athenian people's journey from the chaos of vendetta-law to that of an enlightened civilization establishing order through the fair application of justice. As Robert Fagles and W.B. Stanford say so eloquently in their introduction to the Penguin Classics edition of The Oresteia, that it "...is our rite of passage from savagery to civilization."
In a nutshell, Agamemnon is the story of the triumphant return of Agamemnon from the Trojan War and of his murder by his wife, Clytaemnestra. The Trojan War, prosecuted by the Greeks with the help of the gods, resulted in the deaths of a great many Greek soldiers and the utter destruction of Troy and all of its peoples. Homer's Iliad tells us that the Trojan War was initiated when the Trojan prince, Paris, wooed Helen, the wife of Menelaus, and spirited her off to Troy. Menelaus and his brother, Agamemnon, then rallied the Greek army and set off in hot-pursuit to 'rescue' Helen and avenge the insult done to the Greek peoples' honor. In order to obtain favorable winds for the Greek fleet to sail eastward to Troy, Agamemnon was compelled to sacrifice his daughter, Iphigeneia; an act that Agamemnon's wife, Clytaemnestra, cannot forgive, and which she broods upon during the entire ten-year period that Agamemnon is gone fighting. Are you seeing a theme emerging here? There's a whole lot of killing going on, and most of it is associated with revenge--i.e., the application of vendetta-law.
Reading the Agamemnon turned out to be a truly amazing experience for me. First, it is an absolutely riveting and horrifying tale that simply comes to life on the page. Obviously, I read an English translation of the play, but it still just feels ancient. Fagles' translation is incredibly lyrical and spare and very effectively conveys the emotions of the players and the sheer horror of the plot. Secondly, the moral messages embedded as adages in the play almost leap out at the reader. A few of the more well-known adages include the following: 'violence begets more violence,' and 'Helen--the face that launched a thousand ships,' or that 'the sins of the father are visited upon the son,' and so forth.
The play starts with the watchman notifying Queen Clytaemnestra that he has spied the signal that Agamemnon is finally returning to Argos. She begins preparing the palace for his return. In the meantime, the Chorus of elders comes in and provides us with the back-story of the House of Atreus and its bloody legacy, the reason for the Trojan War, and the sacrifice of Iphigeneia. At this point a messenger arrives detailing the breadth and scope of the Greek victory over the Trojans as well as the great losses suffered by the Greek army.
Finally, Agamemnon arrives at the palace and is welcomed by the Chorus. Clytaemnestra comes out, almost like a spider emerging from its lair, and cajoles her husband to step down from his chariot onto a broad tapestry of red cloth that she has placed on the ground from his chariot to the palace doors. The symbolism is rich as she says,
At this point we realize that there has been another person in the chariot with Agamemnon. It is Cassandra, one of the daughters of the late King of Troy, Priam. Cassandra is an oracle, a prophet, whose powers were bestowed by the god Apollo, but he also made it such that she wouldn't be believed. Standing in the chariot she immediately begins to foretell the bloody murder that is about to occur inside the palace. [The photograph, at left, is of Ms. Lilo Baur in the role of Cassandra in the Royal National Theatre's production of The Oresteia in November 1999. Awesome, huh?] Cassandra tells the Chorus,
I can almost hear Colonel Kurtz from the movie Apocalypse Now,
The Agamemnon is Aeschylus' portrayal of why vendetta-law cannot work for a civilized society. He has now set the stage for the profound moral questions that Orestes and Electra, the surviving children of Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra, must answer in the next play in the trilogy, The Libation Bearers.
***
Stay tuned for my review of The Libation Bearers and The Eumenides.
[This review is based upon the Agamemnon, the first play included in the Penguin Classics softcover edition of The Oresteia, translated by Robert Fagles, 1979, 335 pp.]
I also want to point out that with all of the reading that I have done over the course of my adult life I have encountered countless references and allusions to various ancient literary works, and I have always had to sheepishly read over that reference or allusion and therefore not fully comprehending the point. Clearly, many of the authors of the great literature that we all read and love so much owe a great deal to these earlier poets and authors of antiquity for the classic essays, poems, and dramas that have survived. One immediately thinks of Shakespeare, Keats, Shelley, Byron, Tennyson, George Eliot, Thomas Hardy, and William Butler Yeats, just to name a few, as representatives of those who've relied upon and embraced that ancient story-telling tradition in their own works. I finally came to the realization that in order to fully understand and appreciate many of the world's great literary works, that I needed to spend some time studying these earlier classics, including the ancient Greek canon. This was my rationale for joining my on-line group in the discussion and analysis of The Oresteia by Aeschylus.
It is generally believed that Aeschylus was born near Athens in 525 B.C. of a noble family. It appears that Aeschylus fought with the Greek army in its classic battle against the invading Persian army at the Battle of Marathon. Over the course of his life, Aeschylus wrote more than seventy plays, of which only seven have survived in one form or another. Three of those surviving seven plays make up The Oresteia and were written by Aeschylus in 458 B.C., two years before his death in 456 B.C., at the age of sixty-nine years old, at Gela in Sicily.
The Oresteia is unique in that it is the only surviving example of the ancient tradition of the usual trilogy of Greek tragic drama. The fourth part of The Oresteia that Aeschylus would have originally presented as the normal Greek dramatic tetralogy, the satyr-play, was entitled Proteus; and would have presented the gods and heroes in comic situations that would have lightened the mood of the audience following its viewing of the preceding three tragedies. Unfortunately, The Oresteia's satyr-play has not survived. The three tragedies that comprise The Oresteia include: Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers, and The Eumenides. Collectively, the three plays tell the story of a royal family, the House of Atreus of Argos, and its journey from a dark and bleak legacy of treachery and vengeance to the establishment of a process for formal determination and atonement of guilt through the use of a trial and jury--the process that we now know as Justice. In essence, the three plays recount Aeschylus' allegorical telling of the history of the Athenian people's journey from the chaos of vendetta-law to that of an enlightened civilization establishing order through the fair application of justice. As Robert Fagles and W.B. Stanford say so eloquently in their introduction to the Penguin Classics edition of The Oresteia, that it "...is our rite of passage from savagery to civilization."
In a nutshell, Agamemnon is the story of the triumphant return of Agamemnon from the Trojan War and of his murder by his wife, Clytaemnestra. The Trojan War, prosecuted by the Greeks with the help of the gods, resulted in the deaths of a great many Greek soldiers and the utter destruction of Troy and all of its peoples. Homer's Iliad tells us that the Trojan War was initiated when the Trojan prince, Paris, wooed Helen, the wife of Menelaus, and spirited her off to Troy. Menelaus and his brother, Agamemnon, then rallied the Greek army and set off in hot-pursuit to 'rescue' Helen and avenge the insult done to the Greek peoples' honor. In order to obtain favorable winds for the Greek fleet to sail eastward to Troy, Agamemnon was compelled to sacrifice his daughter, Iphigeneia; an act that Agamemnon's wife, Clytaemnestra, cannot forgive, and which she broods upon during the entire ten-year period that Agamemnon is gone fighting. Are you seeing a theme emerging here? There's a whole lot of killing going on, and most of it is associated with revenge--i.e., the application of vendetta-law.
Reading the Agamemnon turned out to be a truly amazing experience for me. First, it is an absolutely riveting and horrifying tale that simply comes to life on the page. Obviously, I read an English translation of the play, but it still just feels ancient. Fagles' translation is incredibly lyrical and spare and very effectively conveys the emotions of the players and the sheer horror of the plot. Secondly, the moral messages embedded as adages in the play almost leap out at the reader. A few of the more well-known adages include the following: 'violence begets more violence,' and 'Helen--the face that launched a thousand ships,' or that 'the sins of the father are visited upon the son,' and so forth.
The play starts with the watchman notifying Queen Clytaemnestra that he has spied the signal that Agamemnon is finally returning to Argos. She begins preparing the palace for his return. In the meantime, the Chorus of elders comes in and provides us with the back-story of the House of Atreus and its bloody legacy, the reason for the Trojan War, and the sacrifice of Iphigeneia. At this point a messenger arrives detailing the breadth and scope of the Greek victory over the Trojans as well as the great losses suffered by the Greek army.
Finally, Agamemnon arrives at the palace and is welcomed by the Chorus. Clytaemnestra comes out, almost like a spider emerging from its lair, and cajoles her husband to step down from his chariot onto a broad tapestry of red cloth that she has placed on the ground from his chariot to the palace doors. The symbolism is rich as she says,
"Quickly. Let the red stream flow and bear him homeThe vision of the red tapestry reminded me of the elevator scene in the movie adaptation of Stephen King's The Shining when the elevator doors open and the blood spills out in a great gush across the floor! Also, you need to know that only the gods can set foot on crimson tapestries, so Clytaemnestra is able to make Agamemnon commit an egregious offense by walking on it. Symbolically, Agamemnon has turned his back on the audience watching and walks toward his doom as he enters the spider's lair, his wife also has the last word as she closely follows behind him. The palace doors close.
to the home he never hoped to see--Justice,
lead him in!"
At this point we realize that there has been another person in the chariot with Agamemnon. It is Cassandra, one of the daughters of the late King of Troy, Priam. Cassandra is an oracle, a prophet, whose powers were bestowed by the god Apollo, but he also made it such that she wouldn't be believed. Standing in the chariot she immediately begins to foretell the bloody murder that is about to occur inside the palace. [The photograph, at left, is of Ms. Lilo Baur in the role of Cassandra in the Royal National Theatre's production of The Oresteia in November 1999. Awesome, huh?] Cassandra tells the Chorus,
"Murder. The house breathes with murder--bloody shambles!"She sees that with the murder of Agamemnon by Clytaemnestra and her lover Aegisthus, that the curse on the House of Atreus continues; nothing changes, and chaos and the Furies still rule. The Chorus listens to her with mounting horror; as they too now have a sense of impending doom. Cassandra tells the Chorus that she too must die at the hands of Clytaemnestra, but that she will go to her death with honor and dignity--a daughter of a King--and not a slave as the booty of war. Before Cassandra enters the palace to meet her own death, she leaves the chorus with an important prophecy,
"There will come another to avenge us,This entire scene between Cassandra and the Chorus is absolutely spellbinding, and the pathos and drama is palpable. Some of the most powerful dialog I've ever read.
born to kill his mother, born
his father's champion."
I can almost hear Colonel Kurtz from the movie Apocalypse Now,
"Oh, the horror...the horror..."The play now essentially comes to its terrible conclusion with the opening of the palace doors and the Chorus then witnesses the wrathful Clytaemnestra and Aegisthus standing over the bloodied and butchered bodies of Agamemnon and Cassandra. Clytaemnestra has exacted her bloody revenge upon Agamemnon for his killing of their daughter. Violence begets more violence. Chaos rules!
The Agamemnon is Aeschylus' portrayal of why vendetta-law cannot work for a civilized society. He has now set the stage for the profound moral questions that Orestes and Electra, the surviving children of Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra, must answer in the next play in the trilogy, The Libation Bearers.
***
Stay tuned for my review of The Libation Bearers and The Eumenides.
[This review is based upon the Agamemnon, the first play included in the Penguin Classics softcover edition of The Oresteia, translated by Robert Fagles, 1979, 335 pp.]
Labels:
aeschylus,
agamemnon,
ancient greek classic,
ancient greek drama,
book reviews,
drama,
greek trilogy,
poetry,
robert fagles,
the oresteia,
theater,
theatre,
tragedy,
translation,
western canon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








